Nola Pearce: professional regulation

Updated: May 13


PROFESSIONAL REGULATION AND DISCIPLINE

In Castle v Queensland Law Society [2021] QCAT 300, Nola Pearce acted for the regulator of the legal profession in resisting a review of its decision to refuse a practising certificate to a practitioner whom it was not satisfied was a “fit and proper person” as required by the Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld). As to the interface between a decision as to fitness and propriety on the one hand, and on the other a charge or finding of professional misconduct at the suit of the Legal Services Commissioner, Daubney J confirmed that the former does not depend upon any process or outcome to the effect of the latter. The LPA does not require that the QLS’s consideration of fitness to continue holding a practising certificate be preceded by disciplinary charges brought by the LSC by way of a discipline application under the LPA.

Recent Posts

See All

CHAMBERS NEWS Quay 11 Chambers is pleased to welcome Rebekah Bassano to the Chambers group. Rebekah, who came to the Bar in 2021, draws on 18 years of previous experience as a solicitor. She is also

CHAMBERS NEWS Quay 11 Chambers is pleased to welcome Paula Eviston to the Chambers group. Paula comes to the Bar after having worked predominately in Family and Criminal law in Brisbane and on the Gol

CPD / ADVOCACY On 18 November 2021, Matt Black was a speaker at the Legalwise Veterans' Entitlement and the Royal Commission Conference on the topic of advocacy through veterans' claims and tribunal